The problem.
Quality is subjective. One editor calls a draft 'good enough,' another sends it back for a rewrite. There's no consistent measurement system, so quality varies by who reviews it and how much time they have that day.
How it works.
Automated scoring after drafting
Once the writing phase completes, the review phase scores the article on all 8 dimensions using structured evaluation criteria.
Threshold-based revision
Articles scoring below your configured threshold automatically enter a revision loop. They don't reach your review queue until they meet standards.
Score visibility in review
When a draft reaches your queue, you see all 8 scores with specific feedback on what earned high marks and what triggered revision.
Why it matters.
Consistent quality bar
Every article is measured against the same 8 criteria. Quality doesn't depend on who reviews or when.
Reduced review time
Low-quality drafts revise before reaching your queue. You spend time approving, not rewriting.
Quality trends over time
Track how scores change across your content library. Identify which topics or keyword clusters produce consistently stronger content.